top of page
Search

Just moments before lights out at the 2022 Monaco Grand Prix the heavens opened creating a bustle of energy up and down the grid as teams scrambled to fit their cars with the blue striped, wet weather tyres. However, energy and adrenaline soon turned to confusion and frustration when the rain lifted momentarily and the start was delayed. Eventually this was confirmed to be because of a technical issue but it still raised the question of "why are we not racing in the rain?"


The race finally got underway behind the safety car twenty minutes after it's original start time but was soon red flagged when the weather took a another turn for the worse and the swimming pool chicane became exactly that, a swimming pool. Social media came alive and the same questions were repeatedly asked; "why are we not racing in the rain?", "what's the point in wet weather tyres?" and the crucial one, "why was little or nothing learnt after Belgium 2021?"


The 2021 Belgian Grand Prix became infamous in Formula One history after it was abandoned after three long, grueling hours of torrential rain and numerous attempts to race. This left hundreds of fans disappointed, dripping with rain in the grandstands and completely out of pocket. It was more than obvious that lessons needed to be learnt from that race. This is the pinnacle of motorsport and what happened on this day shouldn't be happening. Have we really learnt anything from Belgium?


Formula One cars are enabled to race in the rain due to numerous factors. First off F1's tyre manufacturer Pirelli supply each team with so-called wet weather tyres. The treads on these tyres are deep enough to displace enough water allowing the cars to race. Furthermore, the aerodynamics of each car are not effected by the rain. There is, however, occasions in which it is deemed too wet to race. This is usually when visibility is extremely low and the track is too slippery giving each driver a greater risk of aquaplaning. It does, in short, get too dangerous, even when sat behind the safety car as we saw in Japan 2014 when then the late Marussia driver Jules Bianchi aquaplaned off the circuit into a digger recovering another car. Since this moment, the safety of drivers when racing in the rain has become an important talking point in the world of motorsport and has led to many changes in rules and regulations throughout the year.


However, safety isn't only the reason as to why we're seeing wet races delayed or abandoned. In 2017 F1 introduced faster and wider cars which consequently created more spray thus reducing visibility during wet weather conditions. Unfortunately that was the biggest issue that was faced at the 2021 Belgian Grand Prix and as the rain never eased up the race couldn't get underway.


In conclusion, as the cars evolve, their suitability to wet weather seems to be dwindling. Something needs to change. We can't decide on what the weather is going to do and F1 cannot afford many more races like the 2021 Belgian Grand Prix. It's all well and good with the FIA changing the rules and regulations so that we don't have a repeat of Belgium again which is fine but is it time to make the cars more suited to wet weather again like they used to be? I think the majority of people would agree with me when I say yes.


12 views0 comments
Writer's pictureBron

Disclaimer: The following views are my own and not everything is fact.


The summer break is upon us and although Formula One may be quiet for a few weeks, the media is anything but. It is this point in the season where everything is about driver contracts and with a majority of F1 fans keeping an eager eye on what current Williams driver; George Russell plans to do with his career next season, I take a look at what options Williams has for 2022 if the young Brit does indeed move to a new team.


Although nothing yet seems to be set in stone, F1's worst kept secret could soon become a reality. George Russell could be making the move to Mercedes. But where would this leave Williams? It's no secret that in the past few years Williams have struggled. From 2018-2020 they scored a total of 8 miserable points and their financial woes didn't help them either with longstanding team owner Frank Williams and his daughter Claire selling the team and leaving their roles in 2020 in order to give them, the team, a more financially stable future.


But despite this, things seem to be looking up for the small team from Grove, England. At the 2021 Hungarian Grand Prix, team drivers George Russell and Nicholas Latifi scored the team ten valuable points, ending the long pointless drought. And, at least one of the cars has had the pace (and the driver) to consistently make appearances in Q2 and Q3 in qualifying. They may still be back-markers for now, but maybe not for long. The nine time World Constructor Champions are making a come back, slowly but surely.


And then there's the question of who should drive for the team? For starters, thanks to the improvements the team have made over the past year, a number of potential candidates for the seats have come forward and all of them could bring something to this little team. Whether it's experience, speed or race craft, I take a look at the six drivers who seem to be the front runners for a seat. I'll also be discussing why I think none of the Williams Academy Drivers will appear in next years Williams F1 Team driver lineup.


Nicholas Latifi

Let's begin with Nicholas Latifi. The 26 year old Canadian driver has been driving for Williams since 2020 and seems quite likely to keep his seat for 2022. In the 18 months he has spent racing for Williams, Latifi has scored a total of 6 points after finishing 7th at the 2021 Hungarian Grand Prix. Before that his highest finish was 11th which he achieved at multiple races in 2020. In my opinion, it could be ideal for Williams if they were to keep Latifi. A decent second driver who has, at times, been consistent and can support his teammate while bringing some £££ to the team. As a team at the back of the field, a driver like Latifi would be attractive. But, what are Williams looking for? Experience? Speed? That's the question.


Valtteri Bottas

Valtteri Bottas debuted in Formula One in 2013, ironically with the Williams team. A heavily talked about up and coming talent; Bottas stayed with Williams until the end of 2016 before moving up to the front of the field with Mercedes, whom he still races for to this day. However, things are not looking too good for Bottas at Mercedes. With his constant struggles during the race weekends and with current Williams driver George Russell waiting in the wings; Bottas' time at Mercedes seems to be drawing to a close. So what's next for the Finn? A move back to Williams seems do-able but should it be? Personally, I am conflicted. Bottas has the speed and the expertise to help the team regain what it once was. Despite the changes in management, he knows this team, he also knows a top team. He could be exactly what they are looking for. However, at the same time he has had his chance. He'll never be a World Champion. Maybe it could be time to move on?


Pierre Gasly

And then we come to Pierre Gasly. The Frenchman's career has been that of a rollercoaster. Joining what was then Toro Rosso back in 2017, Pierre has made himself known in the world of Formula One. Most notably, he is known for his infamous demotion from the Red Bull team back to Toro Rosso in 2019. But, that didn't stop him from going on to win the 2020 Italian Grand Prix with Alpha Tauri, Toro Rosso's new name. And now, after numerous years with the Red Bull outfit, Gasly's seem to have emerged as a contender for the potential Williams seat in 2022. However, this is one move that I don't see happening. Gasly is a talent that Red Bull seem convinced they will be able to hold on to. In my opinion, Gasly needs to get out of the Red Bull family if he is to have any success. But a move to Williams won't help him. Not yet anyway. Of course he has the experience to help the team but when will they be fighting for points, podiums or wins again? It could be next year with the regulation changes or it could be ten years time. Gasly doesn't have the time to take that risk. Staying at Alpha Tauri seems the most likely option for the Frenchman next year.


Daniil Kvyat

Russian driver Daniil Kvyat was once expected to do great things in Formula One after winning the GP3 championship in 2013. However, it was not meant to be. Eerily similar to Gasly above; Kvyat was also infamously demoted back to Toro Rosso from the Red Bull Racing Team although despite a third place in Germany 2019, Kvyat's luck had ran out and now the Russian finds himself without a seat for this 2021 season. So why now does he find himself as a contender for the Williams seat? A driver in Kvyat's position would do anything for one of the 20 seats available and if that meant he'd be racing at the back of the grid, then so be it. He wants to be out there, racing in the pinnacle of motorsport. Personally, I think Williams will be an ideal place for him. He knows Formula One and he's a proven winner. As long as he keeps himself out of trouble, he can save his career with this move. I'm definitely watching this space.


Nico Hulkenberg

Another driver left "seat-less" for this year is Nico Hulkenberg. After a shock exit from the sport at the end of 2019, when the German was left without a seat, fans around the globe have wandered how someone with immense talent could be left out like that. But now he is reportedly eyeing a return with the Williams outfit and I, for one, can't blame him. He is, in a way, in the same situation as Kvyat. However, Hulkenberg may come across as a more attractive option to the team with his cleaner race craft and higher experience level. But, as a current reserve and development driver for Aston Martin, will they be willing to let him go? Only time will tell.


Nyck de Vries

Now, this is an interesting one as Dutch racer Nyck de Vries has NEVER raced in Formula One. In fact, at the time of writing, de Vries has been the 2021 Formula E World Champion for less than 24 hours. And, with his Formula E team reportedly leaving the sport for next season, could Nyck be making his way to Formula One? It's possible. Nyck is a Mercedes driver and Williams runs Mercedes engines. The Mercedes Formula One team will be looking to keep a Mercedes backed driver at Williams for the foreseeable future. So this move seems highly likely. However, I'm not fond of it. Nyck has found his feet in Formula E and Formula E is no feeder series. Personally, I'd like to see him stay there and defend his title, but again comes the question of "what team?" I'm worried Formula One might knock his career but as it's the pinnacle of motorsport, I'm sure he is vying for that seat. Out of all the drivers mentioned above, Nyck seems to be in first place.


So, there we have it. The few drivers that seem to be in high contention for the Williams seats. But what about the Williams Driver Academy? They back drivers for a reason, to make their paths to Formula One more simple and more cost effective. But, if their not getting the desired results they won't get the desired outcome. Simple. Right now, all of Williams drivers in the academy are just average. We may see them make their debuts someday but not in the near future.


As for the drivers above, I think we could possibly be seeing a Nicholas Latifi and Nyck de Vries line up at the team for next season. I suppose it seems the most logical to have their current driver and also a Mercedes driver in the team. If I had the choice, I'd be looking at a Daniil Kvyat and Nico Hulkenberg line up. I don't know if it's because I feel sorry for them for not having a seat or if I generally miss watching them race. Either way, they could be good mixture to have with experience and race craft. But for now, we sit and wait in anticipation.





7 views0 comments

*Disclaimer - All views and opinions that follow below are my own.


For years, Formula One have been conjuring up ideas in order to improve the racing in our sport. They first brought us the controversial "Elimination Qualifying" back in 2016. A format that would eliminate a competitor from qualifying every 90 seconds. This was scrapped after only two qualifying sessions due to intense backlash from drivers, teams and fans. And now in 2021, Formula One are trying out a new format - Sprint Qualifying/Race. Do we even know what it actually is, at this point?


The inaugural inclusion of the sprint would take place at the 2021 British Grand Prix in front of a full crowd. The first time Formula One has seen a full crowd in nearly two years due to the Coronavirus Pandemic. The weekend as a whole would take a different format to what we are used to seeing. On Friday we would see the normal "Free Practice One," followed by a normal qualifying session which would replace "Free Practice Two," and thus work out the grid for the Sprint on Saturday. On Saturday morning, "Free Practice Two" would replace "Free Practice Three" and the Sprint race in the afternoon would determine the grid for the main race on Sunday. Ok, are you still with me? It's a little bit confusing.


The Sprint race itself was to be raced over 100km, or 17 laps, with the winner, in this case Red Bull's Max Verstappen, taking pole for the main race the next day. The top three drivers were also to be awarded points to help with their hunts for the championship. Three points would go to the winner. Two to second place and one to third. The point of the Sprint is to give fans more action. A chance to see the fastest people in the world racing at full throttle with no pit stops/pit strategies, fuel saving, tyre saving etc. There is also the added bonus of potentially getting a mixed up grid for Sunday thus making the racing more interesting over all. But did it work? I'm personally yet to fully decide.


When the new format was announced, I was pessimistic. 2016's "Elimination Qualifying" ruined all chances for me to be optimistic about something new. I like the current format and don't see much, if anything, wrong with it. Why change something if it doesn't need changing? Maybe Formula One should look at different aspects of the sport which could help improve the quality of racing? Regardless, I would give the Sprint a go and get myself ready to say "I told you so" to my very small social media following afterwards. But, that wasn't the case. I enjoyed it.


For me, it was all about having that extra race to watch. An extra chance to be in my racing element and nerd out over Formula One, as I would usually do over the course of a normal race. As for the racing itself, I thought it was brilliant. The first lap in particular. Seeing the fastest people in the world driving these ferocious beasts at a low-fuel capacity and at full throttle was immense. In particular, Alpine's Fernando Alonso with a mega start, as well as nail biting battles and overtakes to earn him a 7th place start on the grid for the main event. And, I have to mention Ferrari's Carlos Sainz. A tussle with William's George Russell on Lap 1 caused him to drop to the back of the grid. His comeback to start in 10th the following day is unfortunately not really talked about. But I noticed and I enjoyed.


Despite this, particularly on social media, the Sprint hasn't seem to have won many people over and I can understand why.


First of all, a lot of people, like myself, like the historic aspect of the current qualifying format. The current format is Formula One. Anything else sounds and feels bizarre or wrong but I agree with what Formula One's Managing Director; Ross Brawn, had to say: “I think we can’t be held back by history. I mean, we need to respect history but we must never be held back by history.” In Formula One, cars and tracks are constantly evolving, maybe the formats need to be adjusted to suit them, to maximise as much racing as possible. Or more importantly, maybe we, as fans, need to be more accepting to change?


And, then there is the argument of "what was the point?" I think it is fair to say that not all drivers went full throttle during that Sprint. They were cautious. Why do anything to the car that risks it for the main event? As mentioned above, the first couple of laps were brilliant but it soon slowed into a procession with everyone just wanting to get across the line in one piece, ready for the following day. As for Sunday's grid, it would near enough be as normal.


So that leaves us with the question, "was it successful?" Formula One seem to think so, social media seems divided, as do I, as do the drivers. I think my opinion is - "I liked it. I liked having that extra race. But, was it worth it? What did it achieve?" I personally need to see another race weekend adopt this format to get a proper opinion. Right now, I can't imagine it being an overly feasible way to improve the quality of racing but I understand the aspect behind it. For now, I guess we wait and see.







13 views0 comments
  • Twitter Social Icon
  • Instagram Social Icon
bottom of page